TITLE 19.EDUCATION

Part 1. TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD

Chapter 4. RULES APPLYING TO ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

Subchapter B. TRANSFER OF CREDIT, CORE CURRICULUM AND FIELD OF STUDY CURRICULA

19 TAC §4.28

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to §4.28, concerning Core Curriculum.

The intent of this amendment is to clarify the requirements for the Component Area Option under §4.28(b)(4)(A), and to allow institutions of higher education that offer the fully-transferrable core curriculum an alternative appropriate for interdisciplinary courses for the Component Area Option under §4.28(b)(4)(B). This alternative would allow an institution to certify that a course or courses used to complete up to three semester credit hours of the Component Area Option meets the definition specified for one or more of the foundational component areas, and include(s) a minimum of three Core Objectives, including Critical Thinking Skills, Communication Skills, and one of the remaining Core Objectives of the institution's choice. The amendment to §4.28(b)(4) adds a new subparagraph (C) that states, for the purposes of gaining approval for or reporting a Component Area Option course under the amended provisions in subsection (b)(4)(B), an institution would not be required to notify the Board of the specific foundational component area(s) and Core Objectives associated with the course(s).

Dr. MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Affairs and Research, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Dr. Stephenson has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be to allow institutions of higher education to develop interdisciplinary courses that would otherwise not be allowed in the core curriculum, but that could benefit student persistence and success. There is no effect on small businesses. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. There is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted by mail to MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711 or via email at WAARcomments@thecb.state.tx.us. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, Subchapter S, §61.822, which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to establish a core curriculum for institutions of higher education that offer academic undergraduate degree programs and §61.827 which provides the Coordinating Board with rulemaking authority to implement the subchapter.

The amendments affect the Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, Subchapter S.

§4.28.Core Curriculum.

(a) (No change.)

(b) Texas Core Curriculum. Each institution of higher education that offers an undergraduate academic degree program shall develop its core curriculum by using the Board-approved purpose, core objectives, and foundational component areas of the Texas Core Curriculum.

(1) - (3) (No change.)

(4) Component Area Option (6 SCH).

(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, each course designated [ Courses used ] to complete the Component Area Option must meet the definition and Core Objectives [ criteria ] specified in one [ or more ] of the foundational component areas outlined in paragraph (3)(A) - (H) of this subsection.

(B) As an option for up to three (3) semester credit hours of the Component Area Option, an institution may certify that the course(s): [ The Core Objectives required in the corresponding foundational component area apply to each course used to fulfill the Component Area Option. ]

(i) Meet(s) the definition specified for one or more of the foundational component areas; and

(ii) Include(s) a minimum of three Core Objectives, including Critical Thinking Skills, Communication Skills, and one of the remaining Core Objectives of the institution's choice.

(C) For the purposes of gaining approval for or reporting a Component Area Option course under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, an institution is not required to notify the Board of the specific foundational component area(s) and Core Objectives associated with the course(s).

(5) (No change.)

(c) - (k) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 23, 2012.

TRD-201200285

Bill Franz

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Proposed date of adoption: April 25, 2012

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Subchapter N. PUBLIC ACCESS TO COURSE INFORMATION

19 TAC §4.227

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes an amendment to §4.227, relating to Rules Applying to All Public Institutions of Higher Education in Texas, concerning Public Access to Course Information by clarifying the definition of "syllabus".

The intent of the amendment to this section is to update the definition of learning objectives and to make it consistent with the language in §4.104 which became effective November 29, 2011. The language in §4.104 was adopted as a result of Senate Bill 1726 of the 82nd Legislature, which specified that, with certain exceptions, each institution of higher education shall identify, adopt, and make available for public inspection measurable learning outcomes for each undergraduate course offered by the institution.

Dr. MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Affairs and Research, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Dr. Stephenson has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering the section will be to clarify that undergraduate course syllabi need to state the specific learning outcomes that must be measurable in order to evaluate their success. There is no effect on small businesses. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. There is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted by mail to MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas, 78711 or via email at WAARcomments@thecb.state.tx.us. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 51, Subchapter Z, §51.974(g) and §51.96851(d), which authorize the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to adopt rules regarding institutions of higher education making certain information available to the public.

The amendments affect the Texas Education Code, Chapter 51, Subchapter Z.

§4.227.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) - (8) (No change.)

(9) Syllabus--A document describing the course that satisfies any standards for syllabi adopted by the institution. The document shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(A) brief description of each major course requirement, including each major assignment and examination;

(B) the measurable learning outcomes [ learning objectives ] for the course , as defined in Subchapter E, §4.104 of this chapter (relating to Measurable Learning Outcomes for Undergraduate Courses) ;

(C) a general description of the subject matter of each lecture or discussion; and

(D) lists of any required or recommended readings.

(10) - (11) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 23, 2012.

TRD-201200286

Bill Franz

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Proposed date of adoption: April 25, 2012

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Subchapter R. REVIEW OF LOW-PRODUCING DEGREE PROGRAMS

19 TAC §4.287, §4.291

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to §4.287 and §4.291, concerning the Review of Low-Producing Degree Programs.

Specifically, the amendment to §4.287(4) will increase the minimum requirements for the number of graduates produced by degree programs at institutions of higher education to determine which are Low-Producing Degree Programs. This amendment would be implemented beginning with the FY2010 - FY2014 Annual Report of Low-Producing Programs. The amendment to §4.291(a)(2) will give institutions flexibility in identifying programs that have very limited or no additional cost. The amendment to §4.291(b)(4) will specify the course information institutions of higher education must provide in a temporary exemption request.

Dr. MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Affairs and Research, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Dr. Stephenson has also determined that for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering the sections will be to promote efficiency in higher education by reducing the number of programs that produce low numbers of graduates annually. Although unlikely, there may be impact to the local employment if degree programs are closed. There is no effect on small businesses. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711 or WAARcomments@thecb.state.tx.us. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, §61.051, which describes the Board's role in the Texas system of higher education.

The amendments affect implementation of Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, Subchapter C, §61.051(e).

§4.287.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) - (3) (No change.)

(4) Low-Producing Degree Programs--Degree programs that do not meet the following minimum standards for degrees awarded in the program:

(A) Prior to the FY2010 - FY2014 Annual Report of Low-Producing Programs:

(i) [ (A) ] For career technical certificates, associate and bachelor's programs, an average of five degrees awarded per academic year, to total not fewer than twenty-five degrees awarded for any five-year period;

(ii) [ (B) ] For master's programs, an average of three degrees awarded per academic year, to total not fewer than fifteen degrees awarded for any five-year period; and

(iii) [ (C) ] For doctoral degree-research/scholarship and a doctoral degree-professional practice [ and special professional degrees ], an average of two degrees awarded per academic year, to total not fewer than ten degrees awarded for any five-year period.

(B) Beginning with the FY2010 - FY2014 Annual Report of Low-Producing Programs:

(i) For career technical certificates, associate and bachelor's programs, an average of eight degrees awarded per academic year, to total not fewer than forty degrees awarded for any five-year period;

(ii) For master's programs, an average of five degrees awarded per academic year, to total not fewer than twenty-five degrees awarded for any five-year period; and

(iii) For a doctoral degree-research/scholarship and a doctoral degree-professional practice, an average of three degrees awarded per academic year, to total not fewer than fifteen degrees awarded for any five-year period.

(5) - (8) (No change.)

§4.291.Process for Requesting a Temporary Exemption.

(a) A low-producing degree program is eligible for a temporary exemption if:

(1) (No change.)

(2) The degree is composed primarily [ exclusively ] of courses required for other existing degrees at the institution and there is very limited or no additional cost associated with the degree.

(b) To request a temporary exemption provide the following information:

(1) - (3) (No change.)

(4) The rubric and number of all required upper-division courses in the major and all prescribed upper-division electives in the major, excluding [ core curriculum, ] minor requirements, and free electives.

(c) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 23, 2012.

TRD-201200287

Bill Franz

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Proposed date of adoption: April 25, 2012

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Chapter 5. RULES APPLYING TO PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES, HEALTH-RELATED INSTITUTIONS, AND/OR SELECTED PUBLIC COLLEGES OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

Subchapter B. ROLE AND MISSION, TABLES OF PROGRAMS, COURSE INVENTORIES

19 TAC §5.24

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes an amendment to §5.24, concerning to Rules Applying to Public Universities, Health-Related Institutions, and/or Selected Public Colleges of Higher Education in Texas concerning Criteria and Approval of Mission Statements and Tables of Programs. The intent of the amendment is to bring consistency across the Coordinating Board rules for the standards applying to new doctoral programs. In particular, the amendment would specify the undergraduate success measure that an institution must meet in order to satisfy §5.24(b)(5) and to be in line with §5.46 adopted in January 2011. The Coordinating Board approved changes to §5.46, adding an additional criterion for the approval of new doctoral degree programs. Section 5.46 stipulates that the most recent six-year baccalaureate degree graduation rate of the institution proposing a new doctoral program must equal or exceed the most recent statewide six-year baccalaureate degree graduation rate. The statewide six-year graduation rate is calculated by determining the number of first-time, full-time undergraduate students at public universities, excluding those enrolled at The University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M University, and calculating the percentage of those students who graduated in six years from the same or another institution in Texas.

Dr. MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Affairs and Research, has determined that for the first five years there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of amending the rule listed above.

Dr. Stephenson has also determined that for the first five years the amendments are in effect, the public benefits anticipated as a result of administering the sections will be to ensure that preliminary authority requests to offer doctoral degrees are only granted to institutions that already meet the standard for having those programs fully approved. The rule will ensure that institutions seeking new programs are providing sufficient support to existing undergraduate programs. There is no effect on small businesses. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. There is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted by mail to MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas, 78711 or via email at WAARcomments@thecb.state.tx.us. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, Subchapter C, §61.051(e), which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to approve new degree programs at public postsecondary institutions operating in Texas.

The amendments affect the Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, Subchapter C.

§5.24.Criteria and Approval of Mission Statements and Tables of Programs.

(a) (No change.)

(b) In reviewing a request for preliminary authority to add a doctoral program to the institution's Table of Programs, the Commissioner shall consider the criteria set out in subsection (a) of this section and the following additional criteria:

(1) - (4) (No change.)

(5) demonstrated current excellence of the institution's existing undergraduate and graduate degree programs and how this excellence shall be maintained with the development and addition of a high quality doctoral program; measures of excellence include the number of graduates and six-year baccalaureate graduation rates which should equal or exceed the most recent annual statewide average six-year baccalaureate graduation rate as defined in §5.46(15) of this title (relating to Criteria for New Doctoral Programs) [ that match or exceed those at peer institutions ];

(6) - (9) (No change.)

(c) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 23, 2012.

TRD-201200288

Bill Franz

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Proposed date of adoption: April 25, 2012

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Chapter 7. DEGREE GRANTING COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OTHER THAN TEXAS PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

19 TAC §7.3, §7.14

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to §7.3 and §7.14, concerning Degree Granting Colleges and Universities Other Than Texas Public Institutions. The intent of the amendment to §7.3 is to define the meaning of a reciprocal state exemption agreement as it relates to out-of-state postsecondary institutions wanting to offer distance education in Texas. The new definition will provide a clearer understanding for out-of-state institutions to which Chapter 7 rules apply. Staff also proposes an amendment to §7.14 by amending §7.14(1) to include an exemption based upon participation in a reciprocal state exemption agreement. The intent of this amendment is to clarify the process by which out-of-state institutions receive approval for offering distance education in Texas. This amendment allows the Coordinating Board to enter into reciprocal state exemption agreements that could benefit Texas public institutions of higher education by exempting them from the oversight of other state higher education agencies for the purpose of distance education.

Dr. MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Affairs and Research, has determined that for the first five years there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of amending the rule listed above.

Dr. Stephenson has also determined that for the first five years the amendments are in effect, the public benefits anticipated as a result of administering the sections will be to streamline the process by allowing certain exempt out-of-state institutions to receive permission to offer distance education to Texas students without extensive staff review and to improve staff efficiencies. There is no effect on small businesses. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. There is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted by mail to MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711 or via email at WAARcomments@thecb.state.tx.us. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, Subchapters G and H, which provide the Coordinating Board with the authority to administer the laws regulating private and out-of-state public postsecondary institutions operating in Texas.

The amendments affect the Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, Subchapters G and H.

§7.3.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) - (33) (No change.)

(34) Reciprocal State Exemption Agreement--An agreement entered into by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board with an out-of-state state higher education agency or higher education system for the purpose of creating a reciprocal arrangement whereby that entity's institutions are exempted from THECB oversight for the purposes of distance education. In exchange, Texas institutions of higher education would be exempted from that state's oversight for the purposes of distance education.

(35) [ (34) ] Recognized Accrediting Agency--Any accrediting agency the standards of accreditation or membership for which have been found by the Board to be sufficiently comprehensive and rigorous to qualify its institutional members for an exemption from the operation of this chapter.

(36) [ (35) ] Representative--A person who acts on behalf of an institution regulated under this subchapter. The term includes, without limitation, recruiters, agents, tutors, counselors, business agents, instructors, and any other instructional or support personnel.

(37) [ (36) ] Required State or National Licensure--The requirement for graduates of certain professional programs to obtain a license from state or national entities for entry-level practice.

(38) [ (37) ] Substantive Change--Any change in principal location, ownership, or governance.

§7.14.Distance Education Approval Processes for Degree Granting Colleges and Universities Other Than Texas Public Institutions.

An institution which does not meet the definition of institution of higher education contained in Texas Education Code §61.003 and wishes to offer distance education to students in Texas must follow the requirements in paragraphs (1) - (3) of this section. For the purposes of this section distance education shall mean education or training delivered off campus via educational technologies where the student(s) and the instructor(s) are separated by physical distance and/or time.

(1) Exempt Institutions

(A) (No change.)

(B) An institution is also exempt and does not need to receive permission from the Coordinating Board to offer distance education programs and courses to Texas students if it is covered by a reciprocal state exemption agreement.

(C) [ (B) ] An institution's exemption applies only to the degree level for which the programs or institution is accredited.

(D) [ (C) ] An institution's exemption continues as long as it is in compliance with subparagraphs (A) , [ and ] (B) , and (C) of this paragraph. If an institution is no longer accredited by an accreditor recognized by Texas and/or maintains a physical presence in Texas or if an institution is no longer covered by a reciprocal state exemption agreement , the institution is no longer eligible for an exemption and must receive Coordinating Board authority to offer distance education to Texas students.

(2) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 23, 2012.

TRD-201200289

Bill Franz

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Proposed date of adoption: April 25, 2012

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Chapter 21. STUDENT SERVICES

Subchapter T. THE VACCINATION AGAINST BACTERIAL MENINGITIS FOR ENTERING STUDENTS AT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OR INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION

19 TAC §21.612, §21.614

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to §21.612 and §21.614, concerning the vaccination against bacterial meningitis for entering students at public or private or independent institutions of higher education. The intent of the amendment to §21.612(1)(A) is to expand the definition of a new student to include a student previously exempt under §21.614(a)(2) - (5), should their exception no longer apply. The proposed amendment in §21.614(b)(2) is to delete the requirement that a student seeking an exception from an initial bacterial meningitis vaccination or booster dose for reasons of conscience, including a religious belief, be required to use a conscientious objection form obtained from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS). The amended rules will allow a student to use a form developed by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, which can be downloaded from the agency website, notarized, and filed with the student's institution of higher education.

Dr. MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Affairs and Research, has determined that for the first five years there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of amending the rule listed above.

Dr. Stephenson has also determined that for the first five years the amendments are in effect, the public benefits anticipated as a result of administering the section will be an easing of the burden of requesting the form from the DSHS website and having it sent to the student (which may take up to two weeks). It will also alleviate confusion for institutional representatives in determining when a student is no longer exempt from the immunization requirement under a specific exception. There is no effect on small businesses. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. There is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted by mail to MacGregor M. Stephenson, Assistant Commissioner, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711 or via email at WAARcomments@thecb.state.tx.us. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 51, §51.9192(e), which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules to administer the section.

The amendments affect the Texas Education Code, Chapter 51, Subchapter Z, §51.9192.

§21.612.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) Entering student includes:

(A) New student--A first-time student of an institution of higher education or private or independent institution of higher education, including a student who transfers to the institution from another institution . A student who was previously exempt under §21.614(a)(2) - (5) of this title (relating to Exceptions) will be treated as a new student, should the exception no longer apply. [ ; or ]

(B) (No change.)

(2) - (6) (No change.)

§21.614.Exceptions.

(a) (No change.)

(b) A student, or a parent or guardian of a student, is not required to submit evidence of receiving the vaccination against bacterial meningitis if the student, or a parent or guardian of a student, submits to the institution:

(1) (No change.)

(2) an affidavit signed by the student stating that the student declines the vaccination for bacterial meningitis for reasons of conscience, including a religious belief. [ A conscientious exemption form from the Texas Department of State Health Services must be used. ]

(c) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 23, 2012.

TRD-201200290

Bill Franz

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Proposed date of adoption: April 25, 2012

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114